Arguments: Regarding to the interpretation shortcoming of IoT, listening provide a analysis on IoT, on important areas that need to be further discussed.
Support: The fundamental idea from the listening text is to notify the flaws in IoT which is still haven't been solve yet, which help the reader to understand the overall idea of IoT, and the text briefly mention reasons for each of the flaw as well.
Examples: Listening text mentions the idea of risk numerous time in the text, and the text mentions 3 main idea of the concept,
beneficiary of the IoT system,
the lack of knowledge in the system, and
consequence from data usage which can result in to a breach in privacy or the wrong use of data.
Arguments: Reading text didn't focus on the shortcoming of IoT much, as the text mainly focus on the application of IoT in smart cities
Examples and Support: However, the reading text mentions some issue from implementing IoT in smart cities, like the unreliability from the data from system, and there something that is not mention but can be derived from the text like the idea of regulation of IoT which came from the rapid expansion of IoT as a reason of technological advancement, which is not enough evidence to be use to understand the risk from IoT.
Conclusions: While both of them mentions the risk from the IoT, By comparing their usefulness, the listening text gave great examples to the idea overall of IoT, however, the reading text have provide insufficient evidence for them to be useful for studying the risk of IoT, and it is suggests to rely on some other text instead.
