1. 实验 1 中有两名参与者被剔除，因为他们的总体准确度水平比平均水平低 2 个标准差，因此每个文化组中有 27 人。Two participants were excluded from experiment because their overall accuracy level was 2 standard deviations below the average, resulting in 27 in each cultural group
2.计算这些点位置的算法可以从作者那里获得The algorithm for calculating the position of these points is available from the author
3. 当对中位反应时间而不是平均反应时间进行相同的比较时，观察到相同的文化模式，t (52) = 2.26，p = .03。The same cultural patterns were observed when the same comparisons were made for median response times rather than average response times
4. 两名参与者的数据从这些分析中删除，因为他们在这五项试验中的准确性超过总体组平均值的 2 个标准差。Data for two participants were removed from these analyses because their accuracy in the five trials exceeded the total group mean by 2 standard deviations.
5. 当将这些实验的结果与报告配置效应的 Jiang、Olson 和 Chun（2000）的结果进行比较时，会发现一个显着的差异。尽管这两项研究的参与者都达到了相似的准确度水平，但他们的样本虽小但经验丰富（N = 7，其中大多数参与了其他视觉变化检测研究）似乎误报的次数少于我们的小组，从而导致更高的d ' 估计. 使用与此处报告的两个实验相同的参数来复制配置效果的其他尝试被证明是徒劳的When the results of these experiments are compared with those of Jiang, Olson, and Chun (2000), who report the configuration effect, a significant difference is found. Although participants in both studies achieved similar levels of accuracy, their small but experienced samples (N = 7, most of whom were involved in other visual change detection studies) appeared to have fewer false positives than our group, leading to higher d 'estimates. futile:Other attempts to replicate the effects of the configuration using the same parameters as the two experiments reported here have proved
