导图社区 4 Corporate Issuers
2023年CFA二级企业发行人科目,主要内容有4个模块,其中第一个部分最重要,学习过程中应加强对公式和概念方面的理解和记忆
编辑于2023-06-05 10:02:07 上海2024cpa会计科目第17章,本章属于非常重要的章节,其内容知识点多、综合性强,可以各种题型进行考核。既可以单独进行考核客观题和主观题,也可以与前期差错更正、资产负债表日后事项等内容相结合在主观题中进行考核。2018年、2020年、2021年、2022年均在主观题中进行考核,近几年平均分值 11分左右。
2024cpa会计科目第十二章,本章内容可以各种题型进行考核。客观题主要考核或有资产和或有负债的相关概念、亏损合同的处理原则、预计负债最佳估计数的确定、与产品质量保证相关的预计负债的确认、与重组有关的直接支出的判断等;同时,本章内容(如:未决诉讼)可与资产负债表日后事项、差错更正等内容相结合、产品质量保证与收入相结合在主观题中进行考核。近几年考试平均分值为2分左右。
2024cpa会计科目第十一章,本章属于比较重要的章节,考试时多以单选题和多选题等客观题形式进行考核,也可以与应付债券(包括可转换公司债券)、外币业务等相关知识结合在主观题中进行考核。重点掌握借款费用的范围、资本化的条件及借款费用资本化金额的计量,近几年考试分值为3分左右。
社区模板帮助中心,点此进入>>
2024cpa会计科目第17章,本章属于非常重要的章节,其内容知识点多、综合性强,可以各种题型进行考核。既可以单独进行考核客观题和主观题,也可以与前期差错更正、资产负债表日后事项等内容相结合在主观题中进行考核。2018年、2020年、2021年、2022年均在主观题中进行考核,近几年平均分值 11分左右。
2024cpa会计科目第十二章,本章内容可以各种题型进行考核。客观题主要考核或有资产和或有负债的相关概念、亏损合同的处理原则、预计负债最佳估计数的确定、与产品质量保证相关的预计负债的确认、与重组有关的直接支出的判断等;同时,本章内容(如:未决诉讼)可与资产负债表日后事项、差错更正等内容相结合、产品质量保证与收入相结合在主观题中进行考核。近几年考试平均分值为2分左右。
2024cpa会计科目第十一章,本章属于比较重要的章节,考试时多以单选题和多选题等客观题形式进行考核,也可以与应付债券(包括可转换公司债券)、外币业务等相关知识结合在主观题中进行考核。重点掌握借款费用的范围、资本化的条件及借款费用资本化金额的计量,近几年考试分值为3分左右。
Corporate Issuers
Analysis of Dividends and Share Repurchases
Dividends
Procedure of Dividend Payment
Cash Dividends
Regular
Extra or special (irregular) dividends
A company that does not pay dividends on a regular schedule
A dividend that supplements regular cash dividends with an extra payment
Liquidating Dividends
Goes out of business and the net assets of the company (after all liabilities have been paid) are distributed to shareholders
Sells a portion of its business for cash and the proceeds are distributed to shareholders
Pays a dividend that exceeds its accumulated retained earnings (impairs stated capital)
The effect on shareholders' wealth and financial ratios
Reduces both the value of the company's assets (cash is being paid out) and the market value of equity (by reducing retained earnings)
Liquidity ratio (e.g.,cash ratio and current ratio) decreases
Financial leverage ratios(e.g.,debt-to-equity ratio and debt-to-asset ratios) increases
Stock Dividends
Non-cash form of dividends: the company distributes additional shares of its common stock to shareholders instead of cash
The effect on shareholders' wealth and financial ratios
Stock Splits
The effect on a two-for-one stock split
Reverse Stock Split
Increase the share price
Reduce the number of shares outstanding
No effect on the market value of the firm's equity
Both stock dividends and stock splits have no effect on total shareholders' equity
A stock dividend is accounted for as a transfer of retained earnings to contributed capital
A stock split does not affect any of the balances in shareholder equity accounts
Dividend reinvestment plan(DRP)
Advantages
Encourage a diverse shareholder base by providing small shareholders an easy means to accumulate additional shares
Stimulate long-term investment in the company
New-issue DRPs allow the company to raise new equity capital without the flotation costs associated with the secondary equity issuance using investment bankers
DRPs allow the accumulation of shares using cost averaging
Disadvantages
The extra record keeping involved in jurisdictions where capital gains are taxed
Cash dividends are fully taxed in the year received even when reinvested
Theories of dividend policy and company value
Dividend policy does not matter
Perfect capital market assumptions
No taxes or transaction costs, and symmetric information among all investors
No meaningful distinction between dividends and share repurchases under MM assumption
Dividend is irrelevant to company value
Dividend policy matters
Bird in the hand
Prefer cash dividend to capital gains as it is more certain
A company that pays dividends will have a lower cost of equity capital, resulting in a higher share price
Tax aversion
Taxable investors prefer the way that incurs lower tax
Dividends are taxed at higher rates than capital gains in some countries
Extreme: this argument would advocate a zero dividend payout ratio
Signaling
A company's BOD and management may use dividends to signal to investors about the company's prospects
Dividend increases or decreases may affect share price
A company's dividend initiation or increase tends to be associated with share price increases
Dividend cuts or omissions present powerful and often negative signals
Agency costs
Between shareholders and managers
Managers may have an incentive to maximize their own welfare at the company's expense
Potential investment agency problem might be alleviated by the payment of dividends
Between shareholders and bondholders
The payment of dividends reduces the cash cushion available to the company for the disbursement of fixed payments to bondholders
The payment of large dividends could lead to underinvestment in profitable projects
Factors affecting dividend policy
Investment opportunities: More profitable investment opportunity, less cash dividend
The expected volatility of future earnings: The more volatile earnings are, the greater the risk that a given dividend increase may not be covered by earnings in a future time period
Financial flexibility: A company with substantial cash holdings is in a relatively strong position to meet unforeseen operating needs and to exploit investment opportunities with minimum delay
Flotation costs: make it more expensive for companies to raise new equity capital than to use their own internally generated funds
Contractual and legal restrictions
Impairment of capital rule: dividend paid < retained earnings
Debt covenants: a response to the agency problems that exist between shareholders and bondholders
Tax considerations: effective tax rate depends on taxation systems
Double taxation system: Corporate earnings are taxed at the corporate level and then taxed again at the shareholder level if they are distributed to taxable shareholders as dividends
Dividend imputation tax system
Corporate profits distributed as dividends are taxed just once at the shareholder's tax rate
Effective tax rate = shareholder's marginal tax rate
When earnings that have been taxed at the corporate level are distributed to shareholders in the form of dividends, shareholders receive a tax credit,known as a franking credit
If the shareholder's marginal tax rate is higher than the company's, the shareholder pays the difference between the two rates
Split-rate tax system
Corporate earnings that are distributed as dividends are taxed at a lower rate at the corporate level than earnings that are retained
At the individual level, dividends are taxed as ordinary income. Earnings as dividends are still taxed twice, but the relatively low corporate tax rate on earnings mitigates that penalty
Shareholder preference for current income vs. capital gains
All else equal, the lower an investor's T(D) relative to T(CG), the stronger preference for dividends
Other issues impinge on this preference
T(CG) do not have to be paid until the shares are sold, whereas T(D) must be paid in the year received even if reinvested
In some countries, shares are held at the time of death benefit from a step-up valuation ortax exemption as of the death date
Tax-exempt institutions (e.g. pension funds and endowment funds) are major shareholders in most industrial countries and are exempt from both T(D) and T(CG)
Types of dividend policies
Stable dividend policy (most common)
Not reflect short-term volatility in earnings
Target payout adjustment model
The expected increase in dividends = (Expected earnings * target payout ratio – previous dividend) * adjustment factor
Target payout ratio: the proportion of earnings that the company intends to distribute (pay out) to shareholders as dividends over the long term
Adjustment factor: divided by the number of years over which the adjustment in dividends should take place
Constant dividend payout ratio policy (seldom used)
A higher degree short-term volatility in earnings and/or in investment opportunities
Involves more uncertainty
Global trends in payout policies
The fraction of companies paying cash dividends has been in long-term decline in most developed markets
The fraction of companies engaging in share repurchases has trended upward
There has been a negative relationship between dividend initiations/increases and enhanced corporate governance and transparency
Share repurchase
Shares that have been issued and subsequently repurchased are classified as
Treasury shares: may be reissued
Canceled shares: will be retired
not then considered for dividends, voting, or computing earnings per share
Share repurchase methods
Buy in the open market: the most common; maximum flexibility
Buy back a fixed number of shares at fixed price (tender offer)
Fixed price; repurchase a specific number of shares at a fixed price; at a premium to the current market price
Set a fixed date and a fixed price tender offer can be accomplished quickly
Dutch auction
The company stipulates a range of acceptable prices
Uncovers the minimum price at which the company can buy back the desired number of shares with the company paying that price to all qualifying bids
Repurchase by direct negotiation
The impact on financial statements and ratios
Using the company's surplus cash (internal financing)
Balance sheet
Both asset and equity decrease
Leverage ratio (D/E) increases
Income statement: A repurchase increases EPS only if the funds used for the repurchase would not earn their cost of capital if retained by the company
Using debt to finance the repurchase (external financing)
Balance sheet
Asset constant, debt increases and equity decreases
Leverage (D/E) increases even more
Income statement
Earnings yield<after-tax cost of financing the repurchase, EPS decreases
Earnings yield>after-tax cost of financing the repurchase, EPS increases
Earnings yield=after-tax cost of financing the repurchase, EPS constant
The effect of a share repurchase on book value per share(BVPS)
BVPS > market price (repurchase price), BVPS increases
BVPS < market price (repurchase price), BVPS decreases
BVPS = market price (repurchase price), BVPS constant
Share repurchases vs. cash dividends
Share repurchases are equivalent to cash dividends of equal amount in their effect on shareholders' wealth
Share repurchases usually subject to more restrictions
Share repurchases may not commit the company to follow through with repurchasing shares
Share repurchases in general do not distribute cash in a proportionate manner
Rationales for share repurchases
Potential tax advantages.
Share price support/signaling that the company considers its shares a good investment
Added managerial flexibility
Offsetting dilution from employee stock options
Increasing financial leverage
Analysis of dividend safety
Calculation of dividend coverage ratio
Net income method: Dividend coverage ratio = net income/dividend paid
Free cash flow method: FCFE coverage ratio = FCFE/(dividends + share repurchases)
Scenarios that may raise concerns about dividend safety
Companies that support their dividends and repurchases by reducing productive capital spending, by adding net debt or by some combination of the two
Extremely high dividend yields in comparison with a company's past record and forward-looking earnings
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Considerations in Investment Analysis
Global Variations in Ownership Structures
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG)
Ownership structures
Dispersed vs. Concentrated ownership
Dispersed ownership: many shareholders, none of which has the ability to individually exercise control over the corporation
Concentrated ownership: reflects an individual shareholder or a group (called controlling shareholders) with the ability to exercise control over the corporation
Dual-class shares: grant one share class superior or sole voting rights, whereas the other share class inferior or no voting rights
Horizontal vs. vertical ownership
Horizontal ownership: involves companies with mutual business interests that have cross-holding share arrangements with each other
Vertical ownership (pyramid ownership): involves a company or a group that has a controlling interest in two or more holding companies, which results in controlling interest in the target company
Conflicts within different ownership structures
Principal-agent problem: The combination of dispersed ownership and dispersed voting power vs. managers
Principal-principal problem
The combination of concentrated ownership and concentrated voting power vs. managers + minority shareholders
The combination of dispersed ownership and concentrated voting power
The combination of concentrated ownership and dispersed voting power arises with voting caps
Types of influential shareholders
Banks
Families
State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)
Institutional Investors
Group Companies
Private Equity Firms
Foreign Investors
Managers and Board Directors
Evaluating Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures
Effective corporate governance is critical for a company's reputation and competitiveness
Shareholder activism: shareholders attempt to compel a company to act in a desired manner
Board policies and practices
Board of Directors Structure
Board Independence
Board Committees
Board Skills and Experience
Board Composition
Other Considerations in Board Evaluation
Executive remuneration
Transparency of compensation
Performance criteria for incentive plans (both short term and long term)
The linkage of remuneration with the Company strategy
Pay differential between the CEO and the average worker
Shareholder voting rights
Identifying and Evaluating ESG-related Risks and Opportunities
Materiality and investment horizon
Approaches to identify ESG factors
Proprietary methods
Ratings and analysis from ESG data providers
Not-for-profit industry initiatives and sustainability reporting frameworks
ESG integration
Cost of Capital: Advanced Topics
Cost of Capital Factors
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
公式
Determining WACC is challenging
There is no single, "right" methodto calculate the costs of each source of capital
Assumptions are needed regarding long-term target capital structure, which might not be the current capital structure
The company's marginal tax rate must be estimated and might be different than its average or effective tax rate
Cost of Capital
ERP(equity risk premium): a market risk premium for bearing systematic risk
IRP (idiosyncratic risk premium): a company-specific risk premium
Factors influencing a company's cost of capital
Top-Down, External
Capital Availability
Greater capital availability typically leads to more favorable terms for corporate issuers and lower associated costs of capital
Lower perceived risk translates into lower credit spreads, ERPs, and costs of capital for companies in more mature economies
In less developed capital markets, a lack of corporate debt markets could require companies to rely on other means for funding, such as bank loans or the shadow banking system
Market Conditions
Lower interest rates and tighter credit spreads (during expansionary times), decrease costs of debt and equity capital
Higher relative rates of inflation increase the cost of capital for companies
In countries with greater exchange rate volatility , companies have higher costs of capital
Legal and Regulatory Considerations, Country Risk
Investors in environments offering greater investor protections typically demand lower credit spreads and ERPs, leading to lower costs of capital for corporate issuers
Regulatory policies and guidelines set by government or other related entities
Tax Jurisdiction: The higher a company's marginal income tax rate, the greater the tax benefit associated with using debt in the capital structure
Bottom-Up, Company Specific
Revenue, Earnings and Cash Flow Volatility
Asset Nature and Liquidity
Financial Strength, Profitability, and Financial Leverage
Security Features
Estimating the Cost of Debt
Factors affecting methods of estimating the cost of debt
Type of debt
Traded Debt (YTM)
Non-Traded Debt
If credit ratings exist, apply matrix pricing to estimate a YTM
If no credit rating exists, first estimates a bond's rating class; then matrix pricing
Bank debt
Amortizing loans typically have a lower cost of debt
If a company has recently taken on new bank debt, the interest rate on that loan could be a good estimate of the company's cost of debt
Leases
The present value of the residual value and the lessor's direct initial costs are often not known to the lessee (company) or analyst
The incremental borrowing rate (IBR)
If this rate is not known, the analyst might use the non-traded debt estimation method
Debt liquidity
Credit rating
Debt currency
International Considerations: country risk rating (CRR)
定义: A CRR is a rating applied to a country based on the assessment of risk pertaining to that country, in areas such as economic conditions, political risk, exchange rate risk, and securities market development and regulation
处理: By comparing the median interest rate with the benchmark country's rate, the country risk premium can be derived
The equity risk premium (ERP)
Historical Approach
公式: historical ERP= a broad-based equity market index return -government debt return
Analyst's assumptions
Returns are stationary
Markets are relatively efficient
Decisions in the development of a historical ERP
Equity Index Selection: Broad-based, market-value weighted indexes are typically chosen (e.g., S&P 500 Index, Russell 3000 Index)
Time Period: trade-off
Selection of the Mean Type
Selection of the Risk-Free Rate Proxy
Limitations
ERPs can vary over time so estimates based on a long time series of historical data are not representative of the future ERP
Survivorship bias
Forward-looking Approach
Survey-based estimates
方法: gauge expectations by asking people what they expect
Limitations: these estimates tend to be sensitive to recent market returns
Dividend discount models
Gordon growth model(GGM)
GGM ERP (assumes growth rate is constant)
公式: GGM ERP= Dividend yield on the index based on year-ahead aggregate forecasted dividends and aggregate market value +Consensus long-term earnings growth rate -Long term government bond yield
For rapid growing economies, an analyst might assume multiple earnings growth stages
A fast growth stage
A transition growth stage
A mature growth stage
Assumption: the growth rate of earnings, dividends, and prices will grow at the same rate, resulting in a constant P/E
P/E increases (or decreases) can result from an increase (or decrease) in the earnings growth rate or a decrease (or increase) in risk
Macroeconomic modeling (Grinold-Kroner model)
替代计算(选择长期预测数据)
Limitations
The Cost of Equity (Required Return on Equity)
Public companies
DDMs
the bond yield plus risk premium build-up method
re=rd+RP
Advantages: Estimating a company's cost of debt provides a starting point estimate of the return demanded by that company's debt investors
Disadvantages
Determination of RP is relatively arbitrary
Approach requires company to have traded debt
If the company has multiple traded debt securities, each with different features, there is no prescription regarding which bond yield to select
Common practice: use the company's long term bond YTM
risk-based models
re = Compensation for the time value of money + Compensation for bearing risk
类型
CAPM
β is a measure of the sensitivity of the company stock's returns to changes in the ERP
market model: estimate βi
Fama–French Models
Required return of stock j = rf + β1ERP + β2SMB + β3HML
The five-factor Fama–French model
re = rf + β1ERP + β2SMB + β3HML + β4RMW + β5CMA
RMW: profitability premium, equal to the average difference in equity returns between companies with robust and weak profitability
CMA: investment premium, equal to the average difference in equity returns between companies with conservative and aggressive investment portfolios
Summary
The use of risk-based models is similar
Historical returns are used to estimate the relationship between a company's stock's excess returns and these factors
Slope coefficients from the estimated regression, along with expectations for the factor risk premiums and the risk-free rate, are used to calculate an estimate of the company's required return on equity
Analyst's considerations
Estimates from the different risk factor models often yield different results
The beta coefficient on the market factor (ERP) normally differs between the single factor CAPM and multifactor models
The use of a short-term risk-free rate when computing excess returns to estimate the factor betas in these risk-based models can result in the understatement of the risk-free rate
Private companies
The required return on equity for private companies
A size premium (SP)
An industry risk premium (IP)
A specific-company risk premium (SCRP)
Two choices to estimate the required return on equity
Expanded CAPM
公式
注意事项
β: a peer group of publicly traded companies in the same industry
Determine whether additional risk premia for company size and other company-specific risk factors are warranted. If warranted, add relevant size and company-specific risk premium
Build-up approach
公式
各部分关系
International considerations
Extended CAPM
Global CAPM
A global market index is the single factor, there are no assumed significant risk differences across countries
Expanding this model to include a second factor, such as domestic market index returns, mitigates this to a degree but depends on the availability of reliable financial data in the emerging market
International CAPM
Country spread and risk rating models
ERP = ERP for a development market + (λ × Country risk premium)
λ is the level of exposure of the company to the local country
Country risk premium= the yield on emerging market bonds - the yield on developed market government bonds (sovereign yield spread)
Comparison of International Adjustment Methods
If the company's operations are global, but limited to developed countries, the GCAPM and ICAPM are reasonable methods to apply
If however, the company's operations extend to developing countries, the estimation of the CRP using the sovereign yield approach might be appropriate, but these estimations are based on historical rates and might not reflect the risk premium going forward
Corporate Restructuring
Corporate Evolution, Actions, and Motivations
Corporate issuers change over time
Evolutionary: launching new products and expanding capacity
Revolutionary: changes to the legal and accounting structure of the issuer (e.g.,acquisitions, divestitures and spin offs)
Corporate Life Cycle and Actions
Types of corporate restructurings
Investment
Equity investment: a company purchasing a material stake in another company's equity but less than 50% of its shares
Joint venture: two or more companies form and jointly control a new, separate company to achieve a business objective
Acquisition: one company (the acquirer) purchases most or all of another company's (the target), shares to gain control of either an entire company, a segment of the other company, or a specific group of assets
Divestment
原因: Conglomerate discount——An issuer trading at a valuation lower than the sum of its parts
类型
Sale
Spin off: a company separates a distinct part of its business into a new, independent company
Restructuring
Opportunistic improvement
Forced improvements
Leveraged Buyouts
Motivations for Corporate Structural Change
特点: all types of changes have been found to be pro-cyclical
Evaluating Corporate Restructurings
过程
Initial Evaluation
What is happening and why: involves reading the issuer's press release, securities filings, conference call transcripts, and relevant third-party research
Materiality
Size
For restructuring involving a transaction: the value of the transaction relative to the issuer's enterprise value (EV) (>10%)
For restructurings not involving a transaction, it is the scale of the intended action that is material
Fit: how the change fits in with earlier actions, previously announced strategies, and the analyst's own expectations for the issuer
Time
Preliminary Valuation
Comparable company analysis
方法
Uses the valuation multiples of similar, listed companies to value a target
Common multiples used include enterprise value to EBITDA or sales, price to earnings, (less commonly) enterprise value to free cash flow to the firm
It is more often employed for assessing the valuation of targets in spin offs than for acquisitions or sales because of premium
优缺点
Advantages
Reasonable approximation of a target company's value relative to similar companies in the market
The required data are readily available
The estimates of value are derived directly from the market
Disadvantages
A comparable set of listed companies can be difficult to find or may not exist
The method is sensitive to market mispricing
To estimate a fair takeover price, analysts must add an estimated takeover premium
Comparable transaction analysis
方法: Analysts use valuation multiples from historical acquisitions of similar targets
优缺点
Advantages
The value estimates come from actual transaction prices for similar targets
It is not necessary to separately estimate a takeover premium because it is embedded in the comparable transaction multiples
Disadvantages
The market for corporate control is illiquid
Historical valuation multiples reflect not only historical industry conditions, but also historical macroeconomic conditions that can significantly influence transaction multiples
There is a risk that past acquirers over-or underpaid
Premium paid analysis
Takeover premium (PRM)=(DP-SP)/SP
The meanings
DP = deal price per share of the target
SP = unaffected stock price of the target
Modeling and Valuation
Pro forma financial statements
过程
Pro Forma Income Statement (Acquisition) Modeling
Pro Forma Weighted Average Cost of Capital